6 MLB Teams Dealing With Option Crunches

Spring training is in full swing, and various non-roster veterans and top prospects jostling for space on major league rosters. MLBTR’s Anthony Franco took a look yesterday at some players who are out of minor league options and could find themselves squeezed off their current roster, depending on spring plays out.

There’s another angle with which one can view minor league options, of course: the team side of things. Clubs generally try to avoid stacking too many veteran players who either lack minor league options or have the five-plus years of service needed in order to have say over a potential optional assignment to the minors. Having too many players who can’t be optioned can set a club back when there’s a player or two who needs a couple days off but does not need a full IL stint.

It’s also common in today’s game for clubs to aggressively shuffle their bullpens over the course of a season, too; a lack of optionable players can create a headache for clubs after a blowout or marathon extra-inning game that taxes the majority of the pitching staff. Being able to summon a fresh arm or two from Triple-A without needing to pass someone else through waivers is crucial to preserving depth and keeping a team’s best arms healthy.

Most clubs have plenty of flexibility when it comes to these situations, but that’s not universally true. Around 20% of the league has a very limited number of players who can be sent down without needing to clear waivers, and that could lead to some tough decisions for those clubs as Opening Day draws near. Let’s take a run through some of the game’s least-flexible rosters and see what sort of decisions they’ll be facing as the spring winds down.