Out Of Options Players To Watch This Spring

The final few days of Spring Training always come with a significant amount of roster shuffling. Prospects play their way onto the team. Veterans on minor league deals trigger opt-out or upward mobility clauses that force teams to decide whether to select their contracts or let them go. Each of those unexpected promotions costs someone else an active roster spot.

For players who still have minor league options remaining, that’s less likely to spur roster movement. They can be sent down without going on waivers, so they’ll only be designated for assignment if they’re the final player on the 40-man roster. Teams face a tougher call when deciding on a fringe player who is out of options. Do they shoehorn them onto the bench or in a low-leverage relief role? If not, there’s a decent chance they’re losing that player via waivers or a trade for a minimal return.

We’ve already seen a number of players whose out-of-options status has pushed them around the league. Although it’s not technically an offseason consideration, an out-of-options player is more likely to be DFA over the winter if the team thinks they’ll inevitably be squeezed off the roster at the end of Spring Training.

Jack Suwinski, Vidal Brujan, Ben Rortvedt, Andy Ibáñez and Marco Luciano are among the players who have changed teams at least once (often multiple times) because of their out-of-options status. The Yankees finally succeeded in getting Luciano through waivers unclaimed. The other four players remain on their clubs’ respective 40-man rosters, though with the possible exception of Ibáñez, they’re all facing uphill paths to avoiding another DFA a month from now.

We’ll run through a few more who could be playing for their jobs this spring. This isn’t our annual exhaustive list of every out-of-options player on a 40-man roster. That’ll also be published soon and will include a number of names (e.g. Edward Cabrera, Jo Adell) who obviously aren’t getting cut. This exercise will set aside any players like those aforementioned who have already changed teams this offseason and plenty more who seem most likely to clear waivers and remain with their current clubs in a non-roster capacity.

The Giants are unlikely to have room on the roster for Matos and Encarnacion. There’s a decent chance they both end up squeezed off the roster. They’re each right-handed bats with limited defensive value. Matos has played some center field but should be limited to the corners. Encarnacion is a corner outfielder/first baseman.

Matos has the better shot of the two to win a bench job. He’s four years younger and not too far removed from being one of the organization’s better prospects. Matos has had flashes of capable offense built around his plus bat-to-ball skills, but an aggressive approach has limited his consistency. The 24-year-old owns a .231/.281/.369 batting line with 15 home runs across 593 MLB plate appearances over the past three years. He’s a .287/.345/.505 hitter at the Triple-A level.

Encarnacion hasn’t produced much in 54 big league games over the past two seasons. His ’25 campaign was repeatedly interrupted by injuries. Encarnacion has mashed in Triple-A when healthy and has obvious power upside in a 6’4″, 260 pound frame.