Saturday, July 4, 2026
Submit Press Release
Got Action
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Football
  • Basketball
  • NCAA
    • NCAA Football
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Baseball
    • NCAA Sport
  • Baseball
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Formula 1
  • MMA
  • Boxing
  • Tennis
  • Golf
  • Sports Picks
  • Home
  • Football
  • Basketball
  • NCAA
    • NCAA Football
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Baseball
    • NCAA Sport
  • Baseball
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Formula 1
  • MMA
  • Boxing
  • Tennis
  • Golf
  • Sports Picks
Got Action
No Result
View All Result

What do the numbers say about Orlovsky’s controversial Mendoza-Simpson take?

March 24, 2026
in NCAA Sport
0 0
0
Home NCAA Sport
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


The Alabama star only bests the Indiana standout in interceptions thrown. Mendoza tossed six, while Simpson threw five.

So, the debate is settled, right? No. Let’s consider advanced stats, which show a QB’s ability to play under pressure, something the ESPN analyst said Simpson is better at.

“When it comes to moments of panic and big throws, real NFL throws, I think it’s clearly Ty Simpson,” Orlovsky said. “…I would much rather have Ty.”

Simpson, however, struggled under pressure throughout the season. Per Sports Info Solutions, his passer rating dropped from 118 to 65.7 under pressure in 2025. Mendoza’s passer rating, meanwhile, dipped from 140.2 to 98.3. That’s still not as drastic as Simpson’s. 

Simpson did make more big-time throws than Mendoza. (Big-time throws are a metric Pro Football Focus uses to measure passes with high difficulty and high value.) Per the site, Simpson tied for 1st in BTTs (30) among 168 FBS QBs, while Mendoza tied for 19th (23). 

But for those who are now worried about Mendoza’s ability to deliver in key moments, watch Indiana’s 27-21 win over the Miami Hurricanes in the College Football Playoff National Championship Game. That should tell you all you need to know about how Mendoza performs on the big stage. 

Simpson is capable of producing crucial throws, but he lacks the elite accuracy at all levels of the field to do it consistently. Take a look at their completion percentages below to see how the prospects compare (via PFF). Air yards measure the distance the ball travels through the air. 

Passing depth
 Mendoza

Simpson

Short (0-9 air yards)
140-of-159 (88.1 percent)
133-of-180 (73.9 percent)

Medium (10-19 air yards)
55-of-86 (64 percent)
63-of-108 (58.3 percent)

Deep (20-plus air yards)
29-of-55 (52.7 percent)
26-of-62 (41.9 percent) 

Much of a QB’s success in the NFL depends on landing spot. But that doesn’t change that Mendoza looks like the more pro-ready prospect. 

The Las Vegas Raiders (who own pick No. 1 in the draft) should disregard Orlovsky’s take and other analysts who strongly agree with it. The numbers say Mendoza is clearly QB1 in the class, so the AFC West team shouldn’t be second-guessing itself in the weeks leading up to the draft (scheduled April 23-25 in Pittsburgh).  



Source link

Tags: controversialMendozaSimpsonnumbersOrlovskys
Previous Post

Kyle Whittingham lands his first 2027 recruit for Michigan Wolverines

Next Post

How high could Jeremiyah Love be selected in 2026 NFL Draft?

Related Posts

Why Big 12 Basketball Could Be Even Better in 2026-27 Heartland College Sports – An Independent Big 12 Today Blog | College Football News
NCAA Sport

Why Big 12 Basketball Could Be Even Better in 2026-27 Heartland College Sports – An Independent Big 12 Today Blog | College Football News

July 3, 2026
NIL and Transfer Portal Uncertainty Drive Coaches to NBA, NFL
NCAA Sport

NIL and Transfer Portal Uncertainty Drive Coaches to NBA, NFL

July 2, 2026
Lane Kiffin, LSU flip four-star safety recruit from Steve Sarkisian, Texas
NCAA Sport

Lane Kiffin, LSU flip four-star safety recruit from Steve Sarkisian, Texas

July 2, 2026
Will LSU Jalen Brewster Flip From Texas Tech?
NCAA Sport

Will LSU Jalen Brewster Flip From Texas Tech?

July 2, 2026
South Carolina gets biggest recruiting win of Shane Beamer era
NCAA Sport

South Carolina gets biggest recruiting win of Shane Beamer era

July 2, 2026
The 30-year-old who fooled Texas and played for the Longhorns under a fake name
NCAA Sport

The 30-year-old who fooled Texas and played for the Longhorns under a fake name

July 2, 2026
Next Post
Reds swept in 2-game exhibition series in Milwaukee by Brewers

Reds swept in 2-game exhibition series in Milwaukee by Brewers

Brewers Notes: Outfield plans, bullpen options, and injury updates

Brewers Notes: Outfield plans, bullpen options, and injury updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn TikTok Pinterest

CATEGORIES

  • Baseball
  • Basketball
  • Boxing
  • Football
  • Formula 1
  • Golf
  • MLB
  • MMA
  • NBA
  • NCAA Baseball
  • NCAA Basketball
  • NCAA Football
  • NCAA Sport
  • NFL
  • NHL
  • Tennis
  • Uncategorized

SITEMAP

  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Submit Press Release
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us

Copyright © 2025 Got Action.
Got Action is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Football
  • Basketball
  • NCAA
    • NCAA Football
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Baseball
    • NCAA Sport
  • Baseball
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Formula 1
  • MMA
  • Boxing
  • Tennis
  • Golf
  • Sports Picks
Submit Press Release

Copyright © 2025 Got Action.
Got Action is not responsible for the content of external sites.